Which statement best reflects Phyllis Schlafly's view of the ERA and feminism?

Study for the Civil Rights Test with varied question formats, including multiple choice and true/false. Dive into detailed explanations for each answer. Gain a clear understanding of civil rights laws and their historical impact to excel in your exam.

Multiple Choice

Which statement best reflects Phyllis Schlafly's view of the ERA and feminism?

Explanation:
Phyllis Schlafly argued that the ERA would bring sweeping changes beyond simply extending equal rights to women. She warned that it could require women to register for the military draft, eliminate laws that protect homemakers and traditional caregiving roles, and open the door to changes in marriage that she believed could include same-sex marriages. These arguments framed the ERA as something that would disrupt existing social and legal structures the way many people understood them, not just add more rights for women. That perspective is why the statement describing those broad, transformative effects best matches her stance. The other views treat the ERA as a limited or neutral shift or as something that would strengthen family protections, which aligns less with Schlafly’s critique that the amendment would undermine established gender roles and family law.

Phyllis Schlafly argued that the ERA would bring sweeping changes beyond simply extending equal rights to women. She warned that it could require women to register for the military draft, eliminate laws that protect homemakers and traditional caregiving roles, and open the door to changes in marriage that she believed could include same-sex marriages. These arguments framed the ERA as something that would disrupt existing social and legal structures the way many people understood them, not just add more rights for women. That perspective is why the statement describing those broad, transformative effects best matches her stance. The other views treat the ERA as a limited or neutral shift or as something that would strengthen family protections, which aligns less with Schlafly’s critique that the amendment would undermine established gender roles and family law.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy