Which case held that race-based admissions quotas are unconstitutional but allowed race to be considered as one factor?

Study for the Civil Rights Test with varied question formats, including multiple choice and true/false. Dive into detailed explanations for each answer. Gain a clear understanding of civil rights laws and their historical impact to excel in your exam.

Multiple Choice

Which case held that race-based admissions quotas are unconstitutional but allowed race to be considered as one factor?

The main idea is how the Supreme Court views race in college admissions: quotas are not allowed, but race can be considered as one factor in a broader, individualized review to promote diversity. In Bakke, the Court struck down the fixed racial quota system used by UC Davis Medical School—finding that reserving a certain number of seats for minority applicants violated equal protection. But the decision also opened the door to using race as a factor in admissions, as long as it isn’t a quota and the process remains flexible and individualized. This establishes the principle that while rigid numerical targets are unconstitutional, race can be part of a holistic admissions strategy, a doctrine later refined by subsequent cases.

Which case held that race-based admissions quotas are unconstitutional but allowed race to be considered as one factor?

Study for the Civil Rights Test with varied question formats, including multiple choice and true/false. Dive into detailed explanations for each answer. Gain a clear understanding of civil rights laws and their historical impact to excel in your exam.

Which case held that race-based admissions quotas are unconstitutional but allowed race to be considered as one factor?

Get the latest from Passetra